'They' by Siegfried Sassoon, Summary & Analysis
by Mohamed Zayed, a Linguist
The Bishop tells us: 'When the boys
come back
'They will not be the same; for
they'll have fought
'In a just cause: they lead the last
attack
'On Anti-Christ; their comrades'
blood has bought
'New right to breed an honourable
race,
'They have challenged Death and dared
him face to face.'
'We're none of us the same!' the boys
reply.
'For George lost both his legs; and
Bill's stone blind;
'Poor Jim's shot through the lungs
and like to die;
'And Bert's gone syphilitic: you'll
not find
'A chap who's served that hasn't
found some change.
' And the Bishop said:
'The ways of God are strange!'
‘They’ is a 1917 poem by the English
soldier and poet Siegfried Sassoon. It criticizes the attitude of the official English church to the First World War.
The first verse of the poem revolves around a
bishop's speech about the noble sacrifice of the English soldiers, and in particular
recites his view that "they [the soldiers and the church] lead the last attack / On Anti-Christ". The second verse compares and contrasts the Bishop’s words
with the young soldiers' reply, expressing the woes of four soldiers to which the bishop
replies that "The ways of God are strange!" The bishop represents the
church and government or politicians, who know nothing about the facts of
what will befall the boys yet promise them with glories by sending them to either their inevitable death or--worse--an unbearable life.
Siegfried Sassoon was a British poet
known for his writing anti-war poetry of the First World War. This poem is an example of his first-hand experience of the atrocities of war and the lies of the religious leaders and politicians.
There are two stanzas, written in iambic pentameter, although with an irregular
rhythm, and the rhyme scheme is: (ababcc), (dedeff).
There is religious imagery in the poem in the
image of the ‘bishop’. Added to that, the enemy is
perceived as "the Anti-Christ" which is a biblical symbol for evil used in this context to justify war. This is a satirical comment indicating
that the soldiers or their leaders have depicted or represented the enemy as
evil to justify the war. The second stanza continues to list the horrors
suffered by the soldiers, to which the Bishop replies: 'The ways of God are
strange!' The poet seems to imply that in order to justify war, we have to
vilify the enemy, even turning the enemy into "the Anti-Christ" while dressing the church and political leaders saintly robes by implying that they are the embodiment of Jesus Christ since the enemy is the Anti-Christ.
The last
line is a common statement used by religious leaders to explain things that
cannot be explained and in this poem, is an indictment against war.
The poem is a realistic, rather than idealistic viewpoint of war. In fact, it contrasts the more idealistic,
brave and "glorious" parts of war with the harsh, violent and horrific reflections on men. It starts with a bishop trying to give comfort and solace to men who are about to go to
war. The Bishop states optimistically that war will "change" men
who fight in it, and then lists all of the positive aspects and ways it will change
them. He states that--by the end of the War--they will have
“challenged Death,” “fought in a just cause” and “lead the last attack on
Anti-Christ”. All of these things, naturally, are
things that the men should be proud of and even long for. These deeds are expected to change the men for better
for the rest of their lives.
The Bishop
represents the idealistic approach of war perceiving it as a glorious undertaking; that war shows how brave
and noble one is; and that war is the thing that keeps the entire world in order. And, while true on some levels, in the next
stanza, Sassoon contrasts that very same "imaginary" war-glory with the intolerable, harsh realities that exist.
Men who have gone to war agree with the
Bishop on one thing, that is war does change men, but certainly not for the better as he once promised them. They list all of their war wounds and
tragedies: death, amputation, blindness, shot
lungs, etc. The poem is made more powerful by implying that in the world of war, there are things worse than death, i.e. living without sight or a part of one's body. The soldiers front and highlight these wounds as
definite evidence that the Bishop is right in that change does occurs, but not in
the way he was describing it. The bishop's rather inadequate and pale response to
this awful reality is an ambiguous, evasive and dismissive one. He merely states, “The ways of God are
strange!” This answer is evasive which
avoids the truth and nature of suffering. It shows that the Bishop, a symbol
for the Church and the British politicians, never admits his faults and his
lies that led men to not only their horrible death but also things even worse than death! Even after these decisions were proved to be
tragic decisions, still the politicians will not admit their crimes against their citizens
whom they promised glory; instead, they found nothing but death and
suffering.
As for the form and structure of the poem, it is noticed that the poem consists of two six-lines rhyming parts. The first part is the bishop's inciting to war and his encouraging young soldiers to fight while the second part is the young soldiers' experience of war. Hence, the first part is mean to be examined in comparison and contrast with the second part (illusion and lies vis-à-vis reality and horror). The first line rhymes with the third line of each part while the second line rhymes with the fourth line. Each part ends with a rhyming couplet which serves the function of establishing boundaries between the world of the bishop which is a world of mere claims and lies and the world of the soldiers which is that of reality and suffering. The images of the poem are mainly visual images wherein the audience can actually see the suffering and tragedies of the young soldiers shortly after the war.
Very useful thanks
ReplyDeleteYou are most welcome.
ReplyDeleteThis helped me allot with my school essay thank you.
ReplyDeleteGlad to hear it. All the best!
DeleteVery clear exp. thanks a lot
ReplyDeleteMost welcome. Thanks!
Deleteso great
ReplyDeleteHappy it helped. Thanks!
DeleteYou're a genius! Thank you so much!
ReplyDeleteThank you for your kind words. Have a wonderful day!
DeleteThanks a lot :) literature 3 exam study :)
ReplyDeleteIs there any analysis or reasoning behind the use of common names for the names of the soldiers?
ReplyDeleteAwesome 👌
ReplyDelete